Chemical analysis of his bones suggested he ate a diet of mostly fish. In particular, some prominent figures studying the first peoples to inhabit the Americas, referred to as Paleo-Indians or Paleo-Americans, saw the law as threatening their entire field.
The mystery of how they got there has never been solved. But the teeth were cavity-free signaling a diet low in sugar and starch and worn down to the roots—a combination characteristic of prehistoric teeth.
Finally, the process raised conflict of interest questions. I do not find that the osteologists are just studying the remains as a form of disrespect towards the Native Americans. But how do we know that one specific skeleton belongs to a specific tribe?
Historic buildings have been adapted to new uses and the compact, pedestrian-oriented area has attracted a diverse mix of businesses. The plaintiffs, Chatters, and others expressed outrage that the Indian groups had been allowed to place materials in the containers holding the bones as part of their ceremonies, fearing that the resulting contamination could hamper future studies.
What studies were conducted using the remains?
The plaintiffs hoped to begin their studies by the end of Even as Congress was readying a bill to require the corps to preserve the site, the corps dumped a million pounds of rock and fill over the area for erosion control, ending any chance of research.
Three chapters are devoted to the teeth alone, and another to green stains thought to be left by algae. However, most settlement in the region from the s to the s was centered on the comparatively lush Walla Walla River valley, far to the southeast.
The scientists argued that the remains were not proven to be related to present-day tribes, therefore they should not be subject to NAGPRA, and should be available to the scientific community for study. I kept expressing an interest in the skeleton to study it—at our expense.
The suggestion that they were not related to the Ancient One and the implication that Indian peoples were relative newcomers in their homeland were direct affronts to fundamental beliefs.
There was no positive evidence proving that the Kennewick Man was a Native American, therefore, the anthropologists deserved the remains of the body. We know how time began and how Indian people were created. Ina day examination of the skeleton, led by forensic anthropologist Douglas Owsley, revealed that Kennewick Man had arthritis in his right elbow, both of his knees, and several vertebrae but not severe enough to be crippling.
As early asthe tribes expressed concern that additional erosion could result in exposure of more remains or artifacts, leading to looting by souvenir hunters. While bones and body parts of all groups, including some leading white scientists who posthumously donated their own, were represented, huge numbers of Indian remains -- more than-- ended up in museum collections.
What happened to the remains? Grant Delin Before eroding out, Kennewick Man lay faceup with his head upstream.
Kennewick and Richland, its neighbor just across the Yakima to the north, soon became known for its spring crops, especially strawberries and asparagus, which could be harvested earlier than in most locales because of the mild winters that the Indians had found so enticing. The Burke Museum was the court-appointed neutral repository for the remains and did not exhibit them.
You have to have a higher amount of scrutiny in the scientific process," said Peter Lape, the curator of archaeology at the Burke Museum and an associate professor of archaeology at the University of Washington. This is information that the American public has the right to know" Thomas, xxvi.
Summers are very dry and hot though low humidity makes the high temperatures tolerable. In the eyes of Native American tribes, osteologists are being disrespectful and are disturbing their ancestors resting place. The origin of that diversity, whether from different lineages or local adaptation, is a matter of debate.
Is there proof that the body is in relation to their tribe? It even went so far as to give Johnson a lie detector test; after several hours of accusatory questioning, Johnson, disgusted, pulled off the wires and walked out. It is not that simple to just leave the Native Americans tribes remains alone and let them be.
A new, more permanent bridge was built in its place in May 16, · Kennewick Man Argumentative Essay. Posted on May 16, Brief History. San Jose State University anthropologist Elizabeth Weiss writes in Kennewick Man’s Funeral that she recalls a body was found along the Columbia River in Kennewick, Washington on July 28, Within the following weeks, more remains of the body.
The Kennewick Man Finally Freed to Share His Secrets The book recounts the history of discovery, presents a complete inventory of the bones and explores every angle of what they may reveal. An Exploration of the Kennewick Man Controversy The Kennewick Man controversy is one of the most well known federal court cases dealing with.
So exactly who is the Kennewick Man and why is he so important? Why is he given such a name as to Kennewick Man? Doug Owsley is forensic anthropologist for the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C.
We will write a custom essay sample on The Kennewick Man specifically for you. for only $ Kennewick Man is the name generally given to the skeletal remains of a prehistoric Paleoamerican man found on a bank of the Columbia River in Kennewick, This type of point is a feature of the Cascade phase in indigenous ancient history, which occurred roughly 7, to 12, years BP.
Kennewick Man History and legalities Essay by Bocephus, University, Bachelor's, A- April download word file, 2 pages download word file, 2 pages 11 votes/5(11).Download